The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1 The LOGISTIC Procedure Model Information Data Set WORK.RESULT4 Response Variable response Number of Response Levels 2 Model binary logit Optimization Technique Fisher's scoring Number of Observations Read 490 Number of Observations Used 490 Response Profile Ordered Total Value response Frequency 1 1 236 2 0 254 Probability modeled is response=1. Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables Item Q04 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q05 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q06 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q07 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q08 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q09 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q10 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Q12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Q13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Q14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Q15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Q16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Q17 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 _NAME_ Adam____M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Anne____F 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Audrey__F 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barbara_F 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bert____M 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Betty___F 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blaise__M 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2 The LOGISTIC Procedure Class Level Information Class Value Design Variables Brenda__F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Britton_F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Carol___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 David___M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Don_____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dorothy_F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elsie___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Frank___M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Helen___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 James___M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Janet___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Joe_____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Kim_____F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Linda___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lisa____F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Martha__F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mike____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pete____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Richard_M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rick____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rod_____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ron_____M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Susan___F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Thomas__M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tracie__F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Walter__M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 William_M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zula____F -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Class Level Information Design Variables The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3 The LOGISTIC Procedure Class Level Information Design Variables 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 Model Convergence Status Quasi-complete separation of data points detected. WARNING: The maximum likelihood estimate may not exist. WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based on the last maximum likelihood iteration. Validity of the model fit is The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4 The LOGISTIC Procedure questionable. Model Fit Statistics Intercept Intercept and Criterion Only Covariates AIC 680.623 317.460 SC 684.817 518.792 -2 Log L 678.623 221.460 Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0 Test Chi-Square DF Pr > ChiSq Likelihood Ratio 457.1625 47 <.0001 Score 320.4814 47 <.0001 Wald 111.6935 47 <.0001 Type 3 Analysis of Effects Wald Effect DF Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Item 13 107.1942 <.0001 _NAME_ 34 66.0457 0.0008 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Intercept 1 -0.6980 12.1101 0.0033 0.9540 Item Q04 1 4.5520 0.8580 28.1453 <.0001 Item Q05 1 3.9692 0.7560 27.5622 <.0001 Item Q06 1 3.5053 0.6943 25.4927 <.0001 Item Q07 1 3.9692 0.7560 27.5622 <.0001 Item Q08 1 2.4394 0.5904 17.0685 <.0001 Item Q09 1 3.5053 0.6943 25.4927 <.0001 Item Q10 1 1.6287 0.5368 9.2058 0.0024 Item Q11 1 -0.8284 0.5090 2.6487 0.1036 Item Q12 1 -2.3267 0.6023 14.9247 0.0001 Item Q13 1 -2.0282 0.5765 12.3781 0.0004 Item Q14 1 -3.4998 0.7480 21.8903 <.0001 Item Q15 1 -4.9620 1.1001 20.3432 <.0001 The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5 The LOGISTIC Procedure WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable. Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Standard Wald Parameter DF Estimate Error Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq Item Q16 1 -4.9620 1.1001 20.3432 <.0001 _NAME_ Adam____M 1 -2.3873 12.1398 0.0387 0.8441 _NAME_ Anne____F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Audrey__F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Barbara_F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Bert____M 1 2.7439 12.1506 0.0510 0.8213 _NAME_ Betty___F 1 2.7439 12.1506 0.0510 0.8213 _NAME_ Blaise__M 1 -3.0615 12.1402 0.0636 0.8009 _NAME_ Brenda__F 1 -1.6573 12.1429 0.0186 0.8914 _NAME_ Britton_F 1 1.6865 12.1560 0.0192 0.8897 _NAME_ Carol___F 1 1.6865 12.1560 0.0192 0.8897 _NAME_ David___M 1 1.6865 12.1560 0.0192 0.8897 _NAME_ Don_____M 1 -3.7770 12.1451 0.0967 0.7558 _NAME_ Dorothy_F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Elsie___F 1 2.7439 12.1506 0.0510 0.8213 _NAME_ Frank___M 1 3.6858 12.1501 0.0920 0.7616 _NAME_ Helen___F 1 -17.0515 411.7 0.0017 0.9670 _NAME_ James___M 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Janet___F 1 -0.7640 12.1508 0.0040 0.9499 _NAME_ Joe_____M 1 1.6865 12.1560 0.0192 0.8897 _NAME_ Kim_____F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Linda___F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Lisa____F 1 -0.7640 12.1508 0.0040 0.9499 _NAME_ Martha__F 1 -3.0615 12.1402 0.0636 0.8009 _NAME_ Mike____M 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Pete____M 1 -1.6573 12.1429 0.0186 0.8914 _NAME_ Richard_M 1 -2.3873 12.1398 0.0387 0.8441 _NAME_ Rick____M 1 4.5871 12.1529 0.1425 0.7058 _NAME_ Rod_____M 1 -0.7640 12.1508 0.0040 0.9499 _NAME_ Ron_____M 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Susan___F 1 4.5871 12.1529 0.1425 0.7058 _NAME_ Thomas__M 1 2.7439 12.1506 0.0510 0.8213 _NAME_ Tracie__F 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ Walter__M 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 _NAME_ William_M 1 0.4220 12.1608 0.0012 0.9723 Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits Item Q04 vs Q17 >999.999 670.598 >999.999 Item Q05 vs Q17 >999.999 426.591 >999.999 The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6 The LOGISTIC Procedure WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable. Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits Item Q06 vs Q17 >999.999 289.826 >999.999 Item Q07 vs Q17 >999.999 426.591 >999.999 Item Q08 vs Q17 >999.999 114.212 >999.999 Item Q09 vs Q17 >999.999 289.826 >999.999 Item Q10 vs Q17 728.350 54.890 >999.999 Item Q11 vs Q17 62.405 5.273 738.543 Item Q12 vs Q17 13.948 1.169 166.494 Item Q13 vs Q17 18.800 1.588 222.542 Item Q14 vs Q17 4.316 0.329 56.541 Item Q15 vs Q17 1.000 0.049 20.482 Item Q16 vs Q17 1.000 0.049 20.482 _NAME_ Adam____M vs Zula____F 0.017 0.001 0.287 _NAME_ Anne____F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Audrey__F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Barbara_F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Bert____M vs Zula____F 2.879 0.162 51.143 _NAME_ Betty___F vs Zula____F 2.879 0.162 51.143 _NAME_ Blaise__M vs Zula____F 0.009 <0.001 0.148 _NAME_ Brenda__F vs Zula____F 0.035 0.002 0.624 _NAME_ Britton_F vs Zula____F 1.000 0.051 19.751 _NAME_ Carol___F vs Zula____F 1.000 0.051 19.751 _NAME_ David___M vs Zula____F 1.000 0.051 19.751 _NAME_ Don_____M vs Zula____F 0.004 <0.001 0.079 _NAME_ Dorothy_F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Elsie___F vs Zula____F 2.879 0.162 51.143 _NAME_ Frank___M vs Zula____F 7.383 0.420 129.735 _NAME_ Helen___F vs Zula____F <0.001 <0.001 >999.999 _NAME_ James___M vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Janet___F vs Zula____F 0.086 0.004 1.712 _NAME_ Joe_____M vs Zula____F 1.000 0.051 19.751 _NAME_ Kim_____F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Linda___F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Lisa____F vs Zula____F 0.086 0.004 1.712 _NAME_ Martha__F vs Zula____F 0.009 <0.001 0.148 _NAME_ Mike____M vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Pete____M vs Zula____F 0.035 0.002 0.624 _NAME_ Richard_M vs Zula____F 0.017 0.001 0.287 _NAME_ Rick____M vs Zula____F 18.184 0.987 335.106 _NAME_ Rod_____M vs Zula____F 0.086 0.004 1.712 _NAME_ Ron_____M vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Susan___F vs Zula____F 18.184 0.987 335.106 _NAME_ Thomas__M vs Zula____F 2.879 0.162 51.143 _NAME_ Tracie__F vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 _NAME_ Walter__M vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 The SAS System 09:19 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7 The LOGISTIC Procedure WARNING: The validity of the model fit is questionable. Odds Ratio Estimates Point 95% Wald Effect Estimate Confidence Limits _NAME_ William_M vs Zula____F 0.282 0.013 6.311 Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses Percent Concordant 96.6 Somers' D 0.937 Percent Discordant 3.0 Gamma 0.940 Percent Tied 0.4 Tau-a 0.469 Pairs 59944 c 0.968